A Wet Blanket and Low Expectations
Third Quarter 2012
In this quarter’s perspective, we relate political policies with economic growth, discuss the impact technology can have on investment opportunity, and provide a historical synopsis relating periods of turmoil to investment returns. Our conclusions can be summarized as follows:
- We believe U.S. policymakers have saddled the economy with wet blanket policies
- The wet blanket has stunted the pace of the economic expansion
- Stocks, bonds, commodities, and most other assets are priced consistent with the expectations that the wet blanket policies will continue after the November elections
- As has been the case since the Financial Panic of 2008 (low expectations and modest stock valuations) reality has a low “bar” to clear to deliver upside surprises
- There exist dynamic trends within the economy that transcend elections, country borders, and pervasive economic angst
- In a world struggling to grow, these trends provide investment opportunity
- Bull markets are born of pessimism and grow on skepticism
- Past periods of “intractable” problems can serve as an investment guide to navigating the current troubled environment
Parallels to the NFL
Games were increasingly marked by controversial on-field rulings by the replacement refs. The tipping point was a “blown call” by the refs that determined the outcome of a game involving our home state Green Bay Packers.
The Packers’ incident added to a growing chorus of concerns that the integrity of the game was at risk of being damaged by replacement ref rulings. NFL management quickly moved to end the strike as these fears intensified.
What has made the NFL so successful is fan interest in the competition between teams on the field. Referees, of course, play an important role enforcing the rules of the game. But they are expected to fulfill their supporting role in the background of the action between the two competing teams.
But if ref rulings start determining the outcome of games—and those rulings are controversial—the game runs the risk of being fundamentally changed. In the extreme, instead of the players and teams on the field being the main event, the play becomes subordinated to whims of the refs, as the cartoon displayed above suggests. The ingredients that make the NFL so popular and vibrant suddenly become subject to erosion.
Similarly, the government is an important economic referee enforcing the rules of law within commerce. And, just as the NFL is at its best when the players and teams are the main event, we believe history clearly demonstrates that the economic engine operates best when the government fulfills this task in a supporting role. Government is best “in the background” fostering a relatively stable environment for commerce to unfold.
History provides evidence that when a government thrusts itself into the main event through large-scale controversial economic interventions and sweeping rule changes, economic growth wanes. A wet blanket descends on growth as a growing portion of economic resources become allocated by the political process subject to special interest pressure. Increased government resource allocation “crowds out” allocation by the much more effective Darwinian competitive process of the markets.
Business strategy often (insidiously) shifts from trying to excel within the competitive marketplace, to currying government favor. In the not so far-fetched extreme, “crony capitalism” which plagues the economies of Italy and Greece (to name but two examples) emerges.
But capitalism—the exceptional economic system where the “between the ears” progress has thrived lifting the living standards of so many—revolves around capitalists, that is, human beings (click the chart to the right for a larger view).
Growth may still occur, as sufficient dynamism from the private sector exists. But growth is stunted. Its symptoms are persistently high unemployment, low confidence, lots of money idling on the sidelines, subdued investment into economic undertakings, and much angst about the future. Sound familiar?
The upcoming presidential election is being billed as a choice between competing views on the role of government. At this stage, the election looks too close to call.
As investors, we must navigate whatever environment the outcome of the election brings. Since it is difficult to unseat an incumbent, the “base case” environment we have assumed is to expect re-election.
To this end, the President’s 2012 nomination acceptance speech pledge to engage in “the kind of bold persistent experimentation that Franklin Roosevelt pursued during the only crisis worse than this one” certainly does not suggest the government ref will move back into the background when it comes to the economy. Therefore, our base case assumes the wet blanket will remain plenty wet.
Franklin Roosevelt’s Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Morgenthau, penned this entry in his diary on May 9, 1939 about FDR’s bold, persistent experimentation:
Despite the wet blanket of the past few years, stock prices have climbed a wall of considerable worry and have recovered much of their lost ground from 2007. If this price action appears inconsistent with the heap of economic troubles we have endured, take a look at legendary investor John Templeton’s quote that we have again reproduced:
And the good news appears to be that irrespective of who wins the upcoming election, stocks still remain priced with very glum expectations for the future baked in (click the chart to the right for a larger view).
If the phases of Templeton’s bull market chronology are close to describing the psychology of markets, the stock market only remains in the early phases of pessimism/skepticism.
The past few years, the economic expansion has also demonstrated an ability to grind forward in a football “four yards and a cloud of dust” fashion. There has been sufficient dynamism to fuel the advance despite loads of fear, uncertainty, and doubt. We expect this to also be the case if the wet blanket continues.
The pockets of dynamism represent investment opportunity in a growth starved environment. What are the sources of the dynamism and how durable are they?
Today’s ability to communicate, disseminate, and collaborate on ideas is nothing short of astounding. The jet fuel for new idea generation has never been greater. More minds than ever before now have the ability to participate in sharing and shaping of knowledge as the tools of technology have moved into the reach of people across the world.
One of the hot beds of application of the new ideas lies in manufacturing. Despite endless headlines to the contrary, manufacturing remains big business. Armed with new technologies that significantly enhance productivity, a manufacturing renaissance in this country is underway.
In an even larger sense, some see so much potential in this productivity trend that they believe another Industrial Revolution is underway. This leg is based upon “computational manufacturing”.
Investments we have in companies at the forefront of these trends: simulation software, 3 D printing, direct digital manufacturing sophisticated measurement tools and services, have been gathering investment momentum, and their promise remains substantial in our estimation.
And technology as a productivity enhancer has applications well beyond manufacturing. With competition, markets, and companies transcending country borders, the drive for increased productivity growth is unrelenting.
Businesses may be tentative due to wet blanket reasons about hiring or undertaking large physical expansions. But, if they can outpace the competition by investing in productivity enhancement tools, it’s a different story.
The ability to store and “mine” big data, tools that enable the communication trend, and emerging payment systems also represent fertile investment ground. We have numerous investments in productivity “enhancers” in these areas as well.
In addition, consumer spending patterns reflect some discernible trends. The wet blanket has increased consumer thriftiness and retailers that cater to this trend are garnering market share and profits.
Another trend relates to the “mass customization” of products and services. Whether it is coffee blended to one’s particular tastes or affordable designer goods made available at “value” prices, growth and market share gains await those businesses that deliver across the domestic and global settings.
Today’s fiscal problems, the conditions creating the wet blanket, trouble in the Middle East, growing Japanese and Chinese tensions, are all big, scary problems. But from an investment perspective, today’s problems must be considered in the context of history. The tables below provide a look back to other periods of significant economic trouble. Note how well a blended portfolio of stocks and bonds served investors.
No doubt the significant troubles and economic calamities of those earlier periods also appeared insurmountable. Yet somehow, despite the “intractable” problems of those earlier times which arguably were just as great or greater than those we face today, the economy and the stock market overcame these crises of confidence periods. We expect the same this time as well.
Note below the investment experiences of the 1950s. The following troubles of the period also loomed large:
• Korean War
• Fears of communists infiltrating government
• Fears of a return of the Great Depression
• Fears of nuclear attack
• Russia taking a commanding lead in the space race
• Two recessions during the decade
Today’s pessimistic expectations and subpar stock valuations have the bar set very low for stock investors. Just think what could occur if the wet blanket were to be lifted. Investing in growth in a growth stunted world. That is our strategy.
As always, we remain focused on understanding the current trends in fundamentals because it gives us the best probability for success. And if you’re an active social media user, please consider sharing this topic with your acquaintances.
1 McCloskey, D. (2010). Bourgeois Dignity, Why Economics Can’t Explain the Modern World. University of Chicago Press.
2 Folsom, B. (2008). New Deal or Raw Deal. Simon & Schuster.
3 Zweig, J. (2011. January 22). Will small investors ever warm up to stocks again? Wall Street Journal.